Can everyone here at least agree that to make a prediction based on probability rather than whim or dogma there has to be input of some sort? Does it square with logic that the more credible the input then the more credible the predictive results will be? In lottery error is easy in both hacking and gambling, the two most important aspects - IMHO. Grasping ever bigger pictures of the true nature of the game seems to get harder with each picture. Things get harder to explain and harder to follow. Everyone winds up on a different page and conclusion. I think to myself it's just(i use this word a lot eh) human nature filling in the holes where logic is lacking. Anything to make sense of the misunderstood monster the lottery appears to be.
Powerball is a big one. Probably unbeatable with any system, but that is only my own estimation. I dunno, why not at the least do as much damage as possible and make the monster bleed back some of that hard earned dough?
I kinda like the ole Lottery Post website and community. It's been like a little haven away from all the bad news of the world. I'd like to help out in return. Of course it is up to you. I wouldn't force anything on anyone even if I could for good or bad.
Here it is:
Ten input ranges, each posted by the first ten responding members. There has to be a low and high input for each range. This would be ten sets of ranges rolled into a thousand combination base. Below are a couple of range examples.
A wide range.
1-8-11-17-21
18-29-37-48-53
A narrow range.
3-10-27-36-48
7-12-30-40-53
It's up to you, powerball babies. You post'em, I'll run'em, stick'em in a spreadsheet, write the checker formula's and send'em to anyone who wants'em.