- Home
- Premium Memberships
- Lottery Results
- Forums
- Predictions
- Lottery Post Videos
- News
- Search Drawings
- Search Lottery Post
- Lottery Systems
- Lottery Charts
- Lottery Wheels
- Worldwide Jackpots
- Quick Picks
- On This Day in History
- Blogs
- Online Games
- Premium Features
- Contact Us
- Whitelist Lottery Post
- Rules
- Lottery Book Store
- Lottery Post Gift Shop
The time is now 2:30 pm
You last visited
June 26, 2024, 2:07 pm
All times shown are
Eastern Time (GMT-5:00)
China Pick 3 Testing using VTrack straight front pairPrev TopicNext Topic
-
We had472 (3--28) Root 4. Ft. vtrack was v53x which was due. Still waiting for v52x. I played 471!!!!!!! So close.
The exclusion for the 1st. position was correct but for the 2nd. position it wasn't. I'm just going to focus on the 1st. position. What I've been trying to do is find a way to exclude numbers. If you add the2nd. & 3rd. digits of the 'actual draw' you can exclude that digit too most of the time. However, if you take the actual draw of 472 and add position2 & 3 you get digit9 to exclude (7+2=9) for the next draw. I will not exclude 9xx since I think either 9xx or 8xx will fall tomorrow. You have to be flexible sometimes with these strategies. If you back date you will see that it worked perfectly most of the time. It's possible that 9xx won't be drawn in the 1st. position but I have a feeling it will.I'm playing 965,966,955,865,866,865.
I believe in Occam's razor:
The Simplest Answer is Usually Correct.
-
Exclude!Exclude!Exclude! We tend to focus on what numbers
will be drawn. What if we can exclude numbers and play what is left? If you look at the chart below, sometimes you can exclude up to 3 numbers just using the method below. For now I'm just focuing on the 1st. position. Most states don't publish the 'pre-test' numbers which is a shame because the 'pre-test' draw can give you a heads-up on what might be drawn the next day.According to the chart below we can exclude 9,1 & 4 for the next draw (3-29). Up to this point, it has been 100% successful at excluding the numbers for the next draw. It's impossible for any system to be 100% so at some point it will fail. I did play 9xx for tonight because of v52x
v52x 52/30* 41,46,91,96 is overdue and ft. pair 96x is out over 500 days. Let's see what tonight will bring. Peace out!
I believe in Occam's razor:
The Simplest Answer is Usually Correct.
-
We had 900 (3-29) Root 9. Ft. vtrack v51x. I had a feeling that 9xx was going to drop. The 'exclusion' failed tonight with the previous 'actual draw'. It's okay. It's still a good thing to keep track of. I'm playing these: 869,839,829,569,519
I believe in Occam's razor:
The Simplest Answer is Usually Correct.
-
The exclusion method: For tonight's drawing I should exclude: 9xx,7xx,3xx. I would also exclude the previous number which was 4xx.
That leaves us with 0xx,1xx,2xx,5xx,6xx,7xx,8xx. I'm going with 5xx & 8xx.
I believe in Occam's razor:
The Simplest Answer is Usually Correct.
-
We had 879 (3-30) Root 6. Ft. vtrac wasv43x. Almost had it. I played 869!
According to the 'exclusion strategy' I should exclude:8xx,6xx,7xx,3xx,5xx,9xx,4xx. That's a lot of numbers. I'm left with only: 0xx,1xx,2xx. I'm playing these numbers: 167 & 187/761 & 781 (although 7xx is in the exclude list I'm playing it just in case these numbers come in boxed) hoping that 1xx will be drawn.
I believe in Occam's razor:
The Simplest Answer is Usually Correct.
-
Exclude!Exclude!Exclude!
So I've been focusing on excluding what numbers not to play for the next draw in the 1st. position. As you can see from my previous
posts, the success rate is remarkable based on the last 10 draws or so. I will now also focus on the 2nd. position actual draw exclusion strategy.
I'm not naive to think that it will work 100% of the time but if the odd are high that it works, it's something to look at. Below is for the 2nd position
actual draw to exclude you can add the 1st. & 2nd. & 3rd. digit to get the number to exclude. Last night we had 879. If you add 8+7+9=24: 2+4=6
In the next draw (3-31) x6x has a good chance of not falling according to the method. I have a feeling that x6x will indeed fall tonight.
I did play 167 & 761 but it was before I did this workout. I would also exclude:
7 & 0. I will also be looking at the pre-test numbers to exclude numbers from the 2nd. position.
I believe in Occam's razor:
The Simplest Answer is Usually Correct.
-
-
I believe in Occam's razor:
The Simplest Answer is Usually Correct.
-
This is to exclude the digit from the 2nd. position using the pre-test draw. I realize that for some reason most States don't publish the pre-test draws. I know Texas posts them on their website. New York doesn't which sucks since I'm from NY. The success rate is pretty high using this method so far. The drawing for tonight's 2nd. position should exclude 2. So in total we should exclude 7,0,6,2.
I believe in Occam's razor:
The Simplest Answer is Usually Correct.
-
The reason why I feel x6x might fall (tonight) is because it was out for 42 days before it finally came in the form of 265 (14 draws ago).
When a digit is out for a long time and finally drops, it usually hits within a few days again (0-15 days). This is true of Roots too.
It sort of catches up. Even though my exclude workout says I should exclude x6x, I will ignore it for this reason. In the end, you have to go with
your gut feeling too.
I believe in Occam's razor:
The Simplest Answer is Usually Correct.
-
-
This is where you can see the results for the last 30 days and more. 879 was the last draw (3-30).
There is no database file (that I know of) that you can download like in some other lottery website where you can upload into Lotsoft.
http://tb.zhcw.com/3d/556318.shtml
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I'm also looking at what number followed before in the 1st. position when the 8xx was drawn previously. In the chart below we
can see that on 3/20 we had 818 followed by 794 (3/21). My question is: Will tonight's number exclude the7xx or repeat? The
previous draw that had 8xx was 885 (3/15) followed by 231. Will tonight's number exclude the 2xx or repeat? Lastly on
3/13 we had 827 followed by 143. Will tonight's number exclude the 1xx or repeat? This might not be a good method to exclude numbers
but it might be worth keeping an eye out on it anyway. You can do this for the 2nd. & 3rd. position. Do some back testing to see if it's feasible.
I believe in Occam's razor:
The Simplest Answer is Usually Correct.
-
-
Thanks but I have the database in my Lotsoft.
I only posted the website for you. I have enough data.
I believe in Occam's razor:
The Simplest Answer is Usually Correct.
-
