Search

Neural Net Lottery PickerReply
I was thinking in terms of using historical data to get a general consensus of which settings have been most productive. Then using those results of the lowest total error rates to see if they match anything promising. But then again I am not using it to look for the actual numbers just the sums. There are fewer sums than there are number combinations possibly making it easier to point in the direction of a hit.
Oct 20, 2016, 4:08 am - lottologix - Mathematics Forum

Neural Net Lottery PickerReply
Yeah... But it is now the hunt for 6/7 and 6+Bonus/7 starts. Only playing lines with low Total Error rates might help. We'll see.
Oct 19, 2016, 8:45 pm - MillionsWanted - Mathematics Forum

Neural Net Lottery PickerReply
Back with a new strategy. Based on only playing lines with as low Total Error rates as possible. I generate for example 120 lines in a lottery and only pick the lowest 40(33.3%) to 48(40%) lines for playing. It is a risk to take, because it's not impossible there will be winners among the 80 lines which you ignored/didn't play. If I generate 150 lines I would pick the lowest 50 to 60 lines for playing. I used this strategy for Saturday lotto(7/34) on October 15th. Generated 120 lines and p
Oct 17, 2016, 9:15 am - MillionsWanted - Mathematics Forum

Neural Net Lottery PickerReply
Maybe he should collect draws for 50 plays one day. Then let NNLP predict the best number combinations to use in the future. He should pick the one with lowest Total Error and play it for several draws if he can only afford one line $1 per draw. NNLP should try to hit as many numbers as possible.
Jul 14, 2016, 1:35 pm - MillionsWanted - Mathematics Forum

Neural Net Lottery PickerReply
O.K. I got my lines with the high total error rates that you say,but I got good results,(3/6 prizes almost every draw). It s true that I didn t got 4/6 or better,but I'm not sure that it is essential to have low error rates to be success with the obtained lines. But each person has their own thoughts. Regards
May 15, 2016, 8:00 pm - lottolot - Mathematics Forum

Neural Net Lottery PickerReply
Stoopendaal! Thank you FYI P3 does work (one draw state). I tested the date range below RED Start of Test (did not enter draws after 10/13/2015) -- Results in Green Tue-Nov-03-2015 E 721 Mon-Nov-02-2015 E 753 Sun-Nov-01-2015 E 142 Sat-Oct-31-2015 E 917 Fri-Oct-30-2015 E 221 Thu-Oct-29-2015 E 453 Str8 Wed-Oct-28-2015 E 617 Tue-Oct-27-2015 E 120 Box Mon-Oct-26-2015 E 988 Sun-Oct-25-2015 E 496 Sat-Oct-24-2015 E 078 Fri-Oct-23-2015 E 776 Thu-Oct-22-2015
Nov 4, 2015, 2:50 pm - Makenmo - Mathematics Forum

Neural Net Lottery PickerReply
Thanks for your work. Can you re-post these programs? They no longer exist is the error I get.
Sep 24, 2015, 12:34 pm - lakerben - Mathematics Forum

Neural Net Lottery PickerReply
Hi SergeM, Noise: With this factor you manipulate the weight of the initial randomly generated output values. I'm not sure what the impact of this factor is on the 'performance' of the network (haven't done enough testing). Moment factor meaning: This can improve the learning rate in some situations, by helping to smooth out unusual conditions in the training set. Momentum simply adds a fraction m of the previous weight update to the current one. The momentum parameter is use
Aug 30, 2015, 2:19 pm - stoopendaal - Mathematics Forum

Neural Net Lottery PickerReply
OK, now it is working! Thanks stoopendaal! I read the intro and it is confusing, so here is a couple of questions for you: 1- Can this software be saved on the desktop? If so where is the save as button? 2- How can we use this software to win the BIG MM and PB jackpots? And more importantly, how long do I have to wait before I win the huge jackpots? 3- When you start the training it goes on a loop forever unless you stop it? What are the total error, average error, etc... and how can I
Aug 12, 2015, 12:59 am - adulane62 - Mathematics Forum

Need some help with excel counting verticalReply
okay folks, I am not an excel huru by far and build my spreadsheets by trial an error and a lot of reading and help. With either one of these I do not see how it gives me a total of the numbers off to the side. What am i missing and I do need the 101 verison
Apr 6, 2014, 10:53 am - SkyLine69 - Mathematics Forum