Search

How to simulate a distribution and use the lottery's own randomness against itself.Reply
just reloaded excel and didn't use any zeros, but still nothing. I'll wait in case there's a lag.
Jul 6, 2015, 7:44 pm - amber123 - Mathematics Forum

BinaryReply
This was one of the ways I studied binary and the P5 game. While there is nothing wrong with the way you calculated the binary, there were just too many possible combinations to be of any use. There were a ton of combinations with 1-1-0 binary. Any other method would produce almost the same number of lines. I think the question now becomes, What can we learn from this? As for me, I learned nothing.
Apr 12, 2015, 7:56 pm - GASMETERGUY - Mathematics Forum

Math the old math can't work it's called Transparent MathReply
This is going to be my last post. I am not going to entertain this any longer. I feel terrible to a degree. Make, or whatever name you go by, I wish you nothing but the best and I really mean it, that's just the type of person that I am. I was teasing you because, you might not realize how ridiculous you sound. You have something great and would like to share, go ahead in post it. Until then, you have nothing but claims, that appears to be self-serving for whatever finer reason. In any event, wh
Nov 6, 2014, 6:25 pm - chrissy16 - Mathematics Forum

I think the systems or methods for predicts the lottery is illusion.Reply
Dividing the pool into quadrants is one way of establishing a fixed reference point. Nothing wrong with that kind of thinking.
Aug 25, 2014, 7:42 am - GASMETERGUY - Mathematics Forum

Only For Geniuses :)Reply
Winning a lottery jackpot is my idea of a challenge, not answering a bunch of questions about nothing.
Oct 7, 2013, 4:17 pm - RJOh - Mathematics Forum

Can math and logic improve chances of winning a jackpot?Reply
In the game all or nothing will they still keep 1-24 numbers or will they add more numbers.
Aug 5, 2013, 4:36 pm - shani - Mathematics Forum

Can math and logic improve chances of winning a jackpot?Reply
Nothing I do is proprietary and I prefer to discuss my ideas in a public forum. I use simple math, nothing advanced and the logic I use is just plain common sense. I pick combinations that have never come up that fall within the parameters of 95% of the combinations drawn in previous drawings. Parameters of sums, ranges and gaps are my main ones but I have added others as they gotten my attention.
May 27, 2013, 11:05 am - RJOh - Mathematics Forum

Can math and logic improve chances of winning a jackpot?Reply
There's nothing proprietary about looking at previous drawings and using repeating trends to pick combinations for future drawings.
Mar 24, 2013, 6:23 pm - RJOh - Mathematics Forum

Who has better odds of hitting 3 of 5 ?Reply
Buying 300 QP and winning nothing is almost as hard as buying 1 QP and winning something. Buying 300 QP and winning only a couple of dollars is more likely but probably feels like winning nothing.
Nov 7, 2012, 3:49 pm - RJOh - Mathematics Forum

Divisibility QuestionReply
The download click produces nothing. I get internet explore cannot display blah blah blah . lol
Oct 23, 2012, 3:17 pm - onlymoney - Mathematics Forum