Search

ForumsResults 101 - 110 of 708 for all or nothing. (0.18 seconds)

Some new results on some old techniques.
This is what the first page of each book looks like. If you put the numbers in the even/odd book and leave it open while your working it will fill in the others for you. This part only takes as long as it does to type in the numbers. Page two on the even/odd needs nothing done to it. The up/down books may need a second of work, but not usually. I'll give a demo of it also.
Dec 10, 2012, 4:37 am - Greenfox - Mathematics Forum

Help..Excel Highlight Numbers
I know nothing of VBA or macros! Dont matter how its done just want to be able to enter the 5 drawn numbers in the beginning and have it highlight ONLY those numbers thru the 35 (yes 35 is maximum). I would like say 100 rows.
Dec 8, 2012, 6:59 am - bootleg233 - Mathematics Forum

Divisibility Question
Onlymoney you are always coming up with ways to help people out with your systems ignore the idiots that try to get under your skin. If you don't have something nice to say to people who are helping all of us out say nothing and get a life.
Oct 26, 2012, 10:45 pm - picktowin - Mathematics Forum

pick 3 reduction using mathematical methods and the scientific calculator
I have had system wher I make at least 3 changes a day. That is why I say I'm still working on it. There is nothing abouyt disclosure etc.
Jul 20, 2012, 12:22 pm - lakerben - Mathematics Forum

Does picking the hottest number improve your odds?
Lottoboner Okay, but remember that the numbers are going to sea as a river or The numbers seek balance output, depending on the size of the lottery to see jumps, To see who figures it out (nothing to do with couple of people ahh!)
May 26, 2012, 7:08 pm - dr san - Mathematics Forum

All groups are not equal ...at least they don't play that way.
Hi garyo...... while we're at it ....how about we think about how to best cut up the ALL NOTHing Group ......the 66/396 side of the coin. 66 all nothing box 037, 127, 136, 145, 235, 389, 479, 038, 047, 056, = ?? 146, 236, 245, 489, 039, 057, 138, 147, 156, 237, 049, 058, 067, 148, 238, 247, 256, 059, 149, 158, 167, 239, 257, 069, 078, 168, 249, 258, 267, 348, 015, 079, 169, 178, 259, 349, 358, 016, 025, 269, 278, 368, 458, 017, 035, 125, 279, 369, 378, 459, 027, 036, 0
Oct 23, 2011, 3:56 pm - WIN D - Mathematics Forum

Interest In Backtesting and Simulating Lottery Systems
Probably not to the persons who has nothing to gain by doing it. That's the reason I do my own. Beside the results only matter to me since I'm not trying convince anyone else to do what I do.
Jul 7, 2011, 12:46 am - RJOh - Mathematics Forum

Backtesting and Simulating Lottery Systems
RL-RANDOMLOGIC, What's under discussion here at the moment is the shape of the curve of the distribution of QuickPick winnings in a Pick3 game. You're rambling here has very little if anything to do with that. You said, Try as I might I cannot see the point of what you are doing here. You then proceed to completely ignore the data and graph and make no attempt to answer even one of the questions asked. When your belief is that Backtesting the lottery is also worthless..., ...why are you p
May 12, 2011, 8:22 pm - jimmy4164 - Mathematics Forum

Interest In Backtesting and Simulating Lottery Systems
Jimbooble!!!!! Since your last post, my computer has done 2,397,997,620, +/- 585,686 calculations involving the lottery. You however, have done absolutely nothing to help those poor people who voted that backtesting and simulation might prove uselful. You evoked the word backtesting and simulation in two consecutive threads and yet have failed to define it, explain it, or even attempt to describe any meaningful purpose it might offer. One has to wonder if you know what you are talk
Apr 21, 2011, 11:31 am - garyo1954 - Mathematics Forum

Wave pattern analysis and lottery draw histories
If you notice a pattern of clusters over time, say all high or all low then the next time you see it you can put money on it, hopefully before the clustering ends. If nothing ever clustered then it would be exponentially harder to guess what type of draw would come next.
Apr 3, 2011, 2:00 pm - mayhem - Mathematics Forum