- Home
- Premium Memberships
- Lottery Results
- Forums
- Predictions
- Lottery Post Videos
- News
- Search Drawings
- Search Lottery Post
- Lottery Systems
- Lottery Charts
- Lottery Wheels
- Worldwide Jackpots
- Quick Picks
- On This Day in History
- Blogs
- Online Games
- Premium Features
- Contact Us
- Whitelist Lottery Post
- Rules
- Lottery Book Store
- Lottery Post Gift Shop
The time is now 3:46 pm
You last visited
June 26, 2024, 3:26 pm
All times shown are
Eastern Time (GMT-5:00)
"W're not calling for slaughter of white people – at least for now",
Published:
South African Parliament Votes to SEIZE White-owned Land
“We are not calling for the slaughter of white people – at least for now”, Julius Malema…
(Daily Mail) White South African farmers will be removed from their land after a landslide vote in parliament. The country’s constitution is now likely to be amended to allow for the confiscation of white-owned land without compensation, following a motion brought by radical Marxist opposition leader Julius Malema. It passed by 241 votes for to 83 against after a vote on Tuesday, and the policy was a key factor in new president Cyril Ramaphosa’s platform after he took over from Jacob Zuma in February.
Mr Malema said the time for ‘reconciliation is over’. ‘Now is the time for justice,’ News24 reported. ‘We must ensure that we restore the dignity of our people without compensating the criminals who stole our land.’ Mr Malema has a long-standing commitment to land confiscation without compensation. In 2016 he told his supporters he was ‘not calling for the slaughter of white people – at least for now’.
A 2017 South African government audit found white people owned 72 per cent of farmland. Rural affairs minister for the ruling African National Congress party said ‘The ANC unequivocally supports the principle of land expropriation without compensation’. ‘There is no doubt about it, land shall be expropriated without compensation.’
Freedom Front Plus party leader Pieter Groenewald said the decision to strip white farmers of their land would cause ‘unforeseen consequences that is not in the interest of South Africa’. The deputy chief executive of civil rights group Afriforum said the motion was a violation of agreements made at the end of apartheid.
IS THIS THE FUTURE OF AMERICA?
Comments
L@@K at what happened in Rhodesia; was once most productive exporter of wheat in Africa, and now relies on UN food charity :-(
Post a Comment
Please Log In
To use this feature you must be logged into your Lottery Post account.
Not a member yet?
If you don't yet have a Lottery Post account, it's simple and free to create one! Just tap the Register button and after a quick process you'll be part of our lottery community.
Register